Something’s changing in the legal profession — and not for the better. Once built on independence, advocacy, and service, the profession now seems consumed by rankings, revenues, and reputational polish.
The quiet question many young, vocational lawyers are starting to ask is: Where do we fit in? Or more bluntly: Where do we go now?
In 2024, the UK’s top 100 law firms generated a record £37 billion in revenue — an extraordinary figure in a year of economic instability. These firms dominate the headlines and law school dreams. They shape the way the public sees lawyers: polished, powerful, part of the machine. But are they truly representative of the profession?
Out of over 210,000 solicitors on the roll in England and Wales, only 171,000 hold practising certificates. The Magic Circle firms — a handful of powerful players — employ just a small percentage of that. And at the Bar, of more than 17,000 practising barristers, most are still self-employed. Roughly 3,100 work in employed settings, and around 600 are sole practitioners — many juggling financial strain, regulatory pressure, and little recognition.
And yet, it’s this silent majority — the independents — who keep the wheels of justice turning. They carry out the daily, often thankless work of defending rights, ensuring access to legal support, and standing between the citizen and the state.
Are Chambers Still Holding the Line?
Traditionally, chambers stood apart. They offered space for independent thinkers and strong advocates — people who didn’t fit the corporate mould but carried the weight of professional integrity. But that is shifting too.
Today, many chambers speak the language of business development, targets, and marketing strategies. Barristers are chosen not only for their legal brains, but for their brandability. Practice managers talk about “growth sectors” and “revenue alignment.” This isn’t necessarily wrong — but something’s being lost.
Younger barristers are now being trained to behave more like consultants than advocates. They’re expected to polish their LinkedIn, pad their CVs, and pick practice areas that “scale.” Those who want to do legal aid, housing, immigration, or environmental justice are quietly warned: there’s no future in that.
So again — where do they go?
Is Independence Still Worth It?
Independent lawyering used to mean something. It meant acting without fear or favour. It meant spending time with clients, doing the work that mattered — not just what paid best. That kind of lawyering still exists, but it’s under siege. It’s not glamorous. It doesn’t come with cocktail receptions. And more importantly, it’s not being passed on as a viable model to the next generation.
The market has become louder. Lawyers are now sold as brands. The metrics used to measure them — turnover, billable hours, profitability per partner — are crowding out softer values: fairness, thoughtfulness, professional courage. The result is a profession increasingly divorced from its original purpose.
Enter AI: Threat or Reset?
The rapid rise of AI is likely to widen this divide. Much of the repetitive, process-driven work traditionally done in large teams will soon be handled by machines. This could tighten the corporate grip on the profession, reducing lawyers to managers of systems rather than stewards of justice. But it may also open the door to a renewed appreciation for the truly human aspects of law: judgment, empathy, strategy, and ethics.
For the independent lawyer who can combine legal knowledge with critical thinking and personal service, AI might actually clear space. It could reduce overheads, level the playing field, and allow smaller practices to operate with the efficiency of larger ones — while retaining the close client focus that defines real advocacy. But this will only happen if we defend that space and articulate the value of lawyers as humans, not just service providers.
Can We Still Make Space?
Not all is lost. Some young lawyers are building alternative practices. They’re using technology, forming collectives, and going back to basics: good advice, fair fees, ethical practice. Others are carving out independent paths within the system — but they need mentors, networks, and space to breathe.
If we want the legal profession to reflect more than just its most profitable corner, then regulators, universities, and senior lawyers need to do more. That means challenging the idea that bigger is always better, or that prestige lies only in commercial success. It means asking whether the values that first brought many of us to the law — justice, clarity, service — are still being passed on.
This isn’t nostalgia. It’s about the future of the profession.
Because if the independent lawyer becomes a relic, what sort of legal system will we be left with?
Add comment
Comments